Mid-American Conference Tiebreaker Scenarios

Scenarios where tiebreakers determine conference championship game participants

50 of 125 scenarios

ScenarioCCG MatchupProbability
Miami OHM-OHToledoTOL
3.9%

CCG participants not 100% certain

Miami OHM-OHOhioOHIO
71.3%
Bowling GreenBGSUOhioOHIO
28.7%
3.1%
Bowling GreenBGSUToledoTOL
3.0%
Miami OHM-OHToledoTOL
2.6%
Miami OHM-OHToledoTOL
2.4%

CCG participants not 100% certain

Miami OHM-OHOhioOHIO
82.4%
Bowling GreenBGSUOhioOHIO
17.6%
2.4%

CCG participants not 100% certain

Miami OHM-OHToledoTOL
94.5%
Bowling GreenBGSUToledoTOL
5.3%
2.1%

CCG participants not 100% certain

Bowling GreenBGSUMiami OHM-OH
73.8%
Miami OHM-OHOhioOHIO
26.2%
2.1%

CCG participants not 100% certain

Bowling GreenBGSUToledoTOL
99.5%
1.8%
Bowling GreenBGSUMiami OHM-OH
1.6%

CCG participants not 100% certain

Bowling GreenBGSUMiami OHM-OH
77.1%
Bowling GreenBGSUOhioOHIO
14.0%
Miami OHM-OHOhioOHIO
8.9%
1.4%
Miami OHM-OHOhioOHIO
1.4%
Bowling GreenBGSUToledoTOL
1.4%
Miami OHM-OHToledoTOL
1.3%

CCG participants not 100% certain

Bowling GreenBGSUMiami OHM-OH
98.1%
Miami OHM-OHOhioOHIO
1.9%
1.3%

CCG participants not 100% certain

Bowling GreenBGSUMiami OHM-OH
71.3%
Miami OHM-OHW MichiganWMU
15.3%
Miami OHM-OHOhioOHIO
7.8%
1.1%
Miami OHM-OHToledoTOL
1.1%
Bowling GreenBGSUMiami OHM-OH
1.0%
BuffaloBUFOhioOHIO
1.0%
Bowling GreenBGSUMiami OHM-OH
1.0%
Bowling GreenBGSUToledoTOL
1.0%
Miami OHM-OHOhioOHIO
0.9%

CCG participants not 100% certain

Bowling GreenBGSUW MichiganWMU
91.9%
Bowling GreenBGSUOhioOHIO
8.1%
0.9%
Miami OHM-OHOhioOHIO
0.9%

CCG participants not 100% certain

Miami OHM-OHToledoTOL
77.3%
BuffaloBUFToledoTOL
22.5%
0.8%

CCG participants not 100% certain

Miami OHM-OHToledoTOL
99.9%
0.8%
Bowling GreenBGSUToledoTOL
0.8%

CCG participants not 100% certain

BuffaloBUFOhioOHIO
54.4%
Miami OHM-OHOhioOHIO
45.6%
0.8%

CCG participants not 100% certain

Miami OHM-OHOhioOHIO
64.7%
Miami OHM-OHW MichiganWMU
35.3%
0.8%
Miami OHM-OHToledoTOL
0.7%

CCG participants not 100% certain

Miami OHM-OHToledoTOL
71.3%
Bowling GreenBGSUToledoTOL
28.7%
0.7%

CCG participants not 100% certain

BuffaloBUFToledoTOL
89.5%
Miami OHM-OHToledoTOL
9.6%
0.7%

CCG participants not 100% certain

Bowling GreenBGSUMiami OHM-OH
60.1%
BuffaloBUFMiami OHM-OH
23.2%
Miami OHM-OHOhioOHIO
16.8%
0.6%
Bowling GreenBGSUMiami OHM-OH
0.6%

CCG participants not 100% certain

Miami OHM-OHToledoTOL
78.3%
Bowling GreenBGSUToledoTOL
21.8%
0.6%
Bowling GreenBGSUToledoTOL
0.6%
Miami OHM-OHToledoTOL
0.6%

CCG participants not 100% certain

OhioOHIOW MichiganWMU
61.5%
Bowling GreenBGSUOhioOHIO
38.5%
0.5%
Bowling GreenBGSUBuffaloBUF
0.5%
Bowling GreenBGSUToledoTOL
0.5%
Bowling GreenBGSUToledoTOL
0.5%
ToledoTOLW MichiganWMU
0.5%

CCG participants not 100% certain

Bowling GreenBGSUBuffaloBUF
73.5%
BuffaloBUFOhioOHIO
25.1%
0.5%
Bowling GreenBGSUToledoTOL
0.5%

CCG participants not 100% certain

ToledoTOLW MichiganWMU
99.8%
0.5%

CCG participants not 100% certain

Bowling GreenBGSUW MichiganWMU
99.8%
0.4%

CCG participants not 100% certain

Miami OHM-OHOhioOHIO
60.5%
Miami OHM-OHW MichiganWMU
39.2%
0.4%
Bowling GreenBGSUToledoTOL
0.4%
Miami OHM-OHToledoTOL
0.4%

CCG participants not 100% certain

BuffaloBUFMiami OHM-OH
50.9%
Bowling GreenBGSUMiami OHM-OH
48.0%
Miami OHM-OHOhioOHIO
1.1%
0.4%

How Mid-American Conference Tiebreakers Work

Head-to-head → Common conference opponents → Next-highest opponent → Strength of schedule → Team Rating Score

Some tiebreaker steps involve factors like point differential that cannot be predicted before games are played, leading to uncertain outcomes.