Sun Belt Conference Tiebreaker Scenarios

Scenarios where tiebreakers determine conference championship game participants

50 of 170 scenarios

ScenarioCCG MatchupProbability

CCG participants not 100% certain

James MadisonJMULouisianaUL
64.5%
Ga SouthernGASOLouisianaUL
35.5%
4.7%
James MadisonJMUSouth AlabamaUSA
3.6%
James MadisonJMULouisianaUL
3.4%
James MadisonJMULouisianaUL
3.0%

CCG participants not 100% certain

James MadisonJMULouisianaUL
64.8%
Ga SouthernGASOLouisianaUL
35.2%
3.0%

CCG participants not 100% certain

James MadisonJMUSouth AlabamaUSA
65.5%
Ga SouthernGASOSouth AlabamaUSA
34.5%
3.0%

CCG participants not 100% certain

James MadisonJMULouisianaUL
64.7%
Ga SouthernGASOLouisianaUL
35.3%
2.6%

CCG participants not 100% certain

James MadisonJMULouisianaUL
66.5%
Ga SouthernGASOLouisianaUL
33.5%
2.4%
James MadisonJMULouisianaUL
2.2%

CCG participants not 100% certain

James MadisonJMULouisianaUL
64.7%
Ga SouthernGASOLouisianaUL
35.3%
1.9%
James MadisonJMUSouth AlabamaUSA
1.4%
James MadisonJMUSouth AlabamaUSA
1.4%
James MadisonJMULouisianaUL
1.4%

CCG participants not 100% certain

James MadisonJMUSouth AlabamaUSA
66.0%
Ga SouthernGASOSouth AlabamaUSA
34.0%
1.3%

CCG participants not 100% certain

James MadisonJMUSouth AlabamaUSA
64.1%
Ga SouthernGASOSouth AlabamaUSA
35.9%
1.2%
James MadisonJMULouisianaUL
1.2%

CCG participants not 100% certain

James MadisonJMULouisianaUL
64.0%
Ga SouthernGASOLouisianaUL
36.0%
1.1%

CCG participants not 100% certain

Ga SouthernGASOLouisianaUL
87.6%
Coastal CarCCULouisianaUL
8.3%
Appalachian StAPPLouisianaUL
3.6%
1.1%
James MadisonJMULouisianaUL
1.1%
James MadisonJMUTexas StTXST
1.0%

CCG participants not 100% certain

James MadisonJMULouisianaUL
65.1%
Ga SouthernGASOLouisianaUL
34.8%
1.0%

CCG participants not 100% certain

James MadisonJMULouisianaUL
64.6%
Ga SouthernGASOLouisianaUL
35.4%
0.9%

CCG participants not 100% certain

James MadisonJMUTexas StTXST
63.7%
Ga SouthernGASOTexas StTXST
36.3%
0.8%

CCG participants not 100% certain

Ga SouthernGASOSouth AlabamaUSA
49.2%
James MadisonJMUSouth AlabamaUSA
20.3%
MarshallMRSHSouth AlabamaUSA
12.9%
0.8%

CCG participants not 100% certain

Coastal CarCCULouisianaUL
35.9%
Ga SouthernGASOLouisianaUL
35.0%
LouisianaULOld DominionODU
28.0%
0.8%

CCG participants not 100% certain

Ga SouthernGASOLouisianaUL
45.8%
James MadisonJMULouisianaUL
20.7%
LouisianaULMarshallMRSH
13.9%
0.7%

CCG participants not 100% certain

Ga SouthernGASOSouth AlabamaUSA
86.4%
Coastal CarCCUSouth AlabamaUSA
8.8%
Appalachian StAPPSouth AlabamaUSA
4.3%
0.7%

CCG participants not 100% certain

Ga SouthernGASOLouisianaUL
87.2%
Coastal CarCCULouisianaUL
8.6%
Appalachian StAPPLouisianaUL
3.8%
0.7%

CCG participants not 100% certain

Ga SouthernGASOLouisianaUL
51.3%
James MadisonJMULouisianaUL
18.4%
LouisianaULMarshallMRSH
12.3%
0.7%

CCG participants not 100% certain

Ga SouthernGASOSouth AlabamaUSA
45.3%
Coastal CarCCUSouth AlabamaUSA
40.5%
Appalachian StAPPSouth AlabamaUSA
8.9%
0.7%

CCG participants not 100% certain

Ga SouthernGASOLouisianaUL
87.7%
Coastal CarCCULouisianaUL
7.8%
Appalachian StAPPLouisianaUL
3.7%
0.6%

CCG participants not 100% certain

Ga SouthernGASOLouisianaUL
44.2%
Coastal CarCCULouisianaUL
41.5%
Appalachian StAPPLouisianaUL
9.2%
0.6%
James MadisonJMUSouth AlabamaUSA
0.6%

CCG participants not 100% certain

Ga SouthernGASOLouisianaUL
46.8%
Coastal CarCCULouisianaUL
41.7%
Appalachian StAPPLouisianaUL
8.1%
0.6%

CCG participants not 100% certain

Coastal CarCCUSouth AlabamaUSA
65.2%
Old DominionODUSouth AlabamaUSA
33.4%
Appalachian StAPPSouth AlabamaUSA
1.4%
0.6%

CCG participants not 100% certain

Ga SouthernGASOLouisianaUL
88.5%
Coastal CarCCULouisianaUL
7.2%
Appalachian StAPPLouisianaUL
3.8%
0.5%

CCG participants not 100% certain

Coastal CarCCULouisianaUL
62.5%
LouisianaULOld DominionODU
36.4%
Appalachian StAPPLouisianaUL
1.1%
0.5%

CCG participants not 100% certain

James MadisonJMUSouth AlabamaUSA
63.6%
Ga SouthernGASOSouth AlabamaUSA
36.4%
0.5%

CCG participants not 100% certain

Coastal CarCCULouisianaUL
67.8%
LouisianaULOld DominionODU
30.1%
Appalachian StAPPLouisianaUL
2.1%
0.5%

CCG participants not 100% certain

Coastal CarCCULouisianaUL
36.7%
Ga SouthernGASOLouisianaUL
35.6%
LouisianaULOld DominionODU
27.1%
0.5%

CCG participants not 100% certain

Coastal CarCCUSouth AlabamaUSA
35.8%
Ga SouthernGASOSouth AlabamaUSA
35.4%
Old DominionODUSouth AlabamaUSA
28.1%
0.4%

CCG participants not 100% certain

Coastal CarCCULouisianaUL
36.8%
Ga SouthernGASOLouisianaUL
35.6%
LouisianaULOld DominionODU
26.9%
0.4%
Ga SouthernGASOSouth AlabamaUSA
0.4%
James MadisonJMUTexas StTXST
0.4%

CCG participants not 100% certain

James MadisonJMULouisianaUL
40.3%
James MadisonJMUTexas StTXST
17.9%
Ga SouthernGASOLouisianaUL
16.7%
0.3%

CCG participants not 100% certain

Coastal CarCCULouisianaUL
41.3%
Ga SouthernGASOLouisianaUL
32.0%
LouisianaULOld DominionODU
25.9%
0.3%

CCG participants not 100% certain

James MadisonJMUTexas StTXST
72.4%
Ga SouthernGASOTexas StTXST
27.6%
0.3%

CCG participants not 100% certain

Ga SouthernGASOSouth AlabamaUSA
49.8%
James MadisonJMUSouth AlabamaUSA
19.3%
Coastal CarCCUSouth AlabamaUSA
13.1%
0.3%
James MadisonJMULouisianaUL
0.3%

CCG participants not 100% certain

Ga SouthernGASOSouth AlabamaUSA
48.6%
Coastal CarCCUSouth AlabamaUSA
37.4%
Appalachian StAPPSouth AlabamaUSA
7.8%
0.3%

How Sun Belt Conference Tiebreakers Work

Divisional (East vs. West): each division champion is decided by head-to-head → next-highest team → non-divisional common opponents → strength of schedule, then the two champions meet in the CCG

Some tiebreaker steps involve factors like point differential that cannot be predicted before games are played, leading to uncertain outcomes.