American Athletic Conference Tiebreaker Scenarios

Scenarios where tiebreakers determine conference championship game participants

50 of 109 scenarios

ScenarioCCG MatchupProbability

CCG participants not 100% certain

North TexasUNTSouth FloridaUSF
68.5%
East CarolinaECUTulaneTULN
21.5%
East CarolinaECUSouth FloridaUSF
8.7%
4.8%

CCG participants not 100% certain

North TexasUNTSouth FloridaUSF
99.2%
1.8%

CCG participants not 100% certain

MemphisMEMNorth TexasUNT
42.6%
North TexasUNTSouth FloridaUSF
39.3%
NavyNAVYNorth TexasUNT
18.1%
1.6%

CCG participants not 100% certain

NavyNAVYNorth TexasUNT
65.1%
North TexasUNTSouth FloridaUSF
34.9%
1.2%

CCG participants not 100% certain

North TexasUNTSouth FloridaUSF
63.4%
NavyNAVYNorth TexasUNT
34.5%
North TexasUNTTulaneTULN
2.0%
1.2%
MemphisMEMNorth TexasUNT
1.2%

CCG participants not 100% certain

North TexasUNTSouth FloridaUSF
38.0%
NavyNAVYNorth TexasUNT
32.1%
MemphisMEMNorth TexasUNT
29.9%
0.9%
MemphisMEMTulaneTULN
0.8%

CCG participants not 100% certain

MemphisMEMSouth FloridaUSF
95.0%
North TexasUNTSouth FloridaUSF
5.1%
0.7%
MemphisMEMNorth TexasUNT
0.7%

CCG participants not 100% certain

North TexasUNTSouth FloridaUSF
89.5%
NavyNAVYSouth FloridaUSF
6.7%
South FloridaUSFTulaneTULN
3.3%
0.7%
MemphisMEMTulaneTULN
0.6%
MemphisMEMSouth FloridaUSF
0.6%

CCG participants not 100% certain

NavyNAVYTulaneTULN
50.9%
South FloridaUSFTulaneTULN
36.1%
North TexasUNTTulaneTULN
8.9%
0.6%

CCG participants not 100% certain

South FloridaUSFTulaneTULN
69.4%
North TexasUNTTulaneTULN
10.7%
NavyNAVYTulaneTULN
10.2%
0.6%

CCG participants not 100% certain

NavyNAVYNorth TexasUNT
74.9%
North TexasUNTSouth FloridaUSF
25.1%
0.4%
MemphisMEMTulaneTULN
0.4%

CCG participants not 100% certain

MemphisMEMSouth FloridaUSF
52.5%
MemphisMEMNavyNAVY
34.3%
MemphisMEMNorth TexasUNT
4.9%
0.4%
MemphisMEMTulaneTULN
0.3%

CCG participants not 100% certain

North TexasUNTSouth FloridaUSF
96.2%
East CarolinaECUNorth TexasUNT
2.8%
East CarolinaECUSouth FloridaUSF
1.1%
0.3%

CCG participants not 100% certain

MemphisMEMNavyNAVY
56.1%
MemphisMEMSouth FloridaUSF
36.1%
MemphisMEMNorth TexasUNT
5.0%
0.3%

CCG participants not 100% certain

NavyNAVYNorth TexasUNT
37.7%
NavyNAVYSouth FloridaUSF
31.3%
North TexasUNTSouth FloridaUSF
24.9%
0.3%

CCG participants not 100% certain

North TexasUNTSouth FloridaUSF
50.6%
NavyNAVYSouth FloridaUSF
21.6%
NavyNAVYNorth TexasUNT
19.6%
0.2%

CCG participants not 100% certain

North TexasUNTTulaneTULN
63.8%
East CarolinaECUTulaneTULN
31.7%
East CarolinaECUNorth TexasUNT
4.5%
0.2%

CCG participants not 100% certain

NavyNAVYTulaneTULN
76.6%
South FloridaUSFTulaneTULN
22.5%
0.2%

CCG participants not 100% certain

North TexasUNTSouth FloridaUSF
73.0%
NavyNAVYNorth TexasUNT
27.0%
0.2%

CCG participants not 100% certain

MemphisMEMNavyNAVY
50.7%
MemphisMEMSouth FloridaUSF
36.5%
NavyNAVYNorth TexasUNT
7.3%
0.2%

CCG participants not 100% certain

North TexasUNTSouth FloridaUSF
83.0%
NavyNAVYSouth FloridaUSF
17.0%
0.2%

CCG participants not 100% certain

East CarolinaECUNavyNAVY
39.3%
East CarolinaECUSouth FloridaUSF
27.6%
East CarolinaECUNorth TexasUNT
25.7%
0.2%
MemphisMEMNorth TexasUNT
0.2%

CCG participants not 100% certain

MemphisMEMNavyNAVY
82.3%
MemphisMEMSouth FloridaUSF
15.4%
MemphisMEMTulaneTULN
1.1%
0.2%

CCG participants not 100% certain

MemphisMEMNorth TexasUNT
79.9%
NavyNAVYNorth TexasUNT
12.5%
North TexasUNTTulaneTULN
7.6%
0.2%

CCG participants not 100% certain

North TexasUNTSouth FloridaUSF
66.3%
NavyNAVYNorth TexasUNT
33.7%
0.2%

CCG participants not 100% certain

East CarolinaECUNavyNAVY
66.7%
East CarolinaECUSouth FloridaUSF
15.8%
East CarolinaECUNorth TexasUNT
12.7%
0.2%

CCG participants not 100% certain

North TexasUNTSouth FloridaUSF
73.0%
NavyNAVYSouth FloridaUSF
27.0%
0.1%

CCG participants not 100% certain

NavyNAVYNorth TexasUNT
98.0%
North TexasUNTTulaneTULN
1.9%
0.1%
MemphisMEMNorth TexasUNT
0.1%

CCG participants not 100% certain

MemphisMEMNorth TexasUNT
86.7%
North TexasUNTTulaneTULN
13.3%
0.1%

CCG participants not 100% certain

NavyNAVYNorth TexasUNT
88.8%
North TexasUNTTulaneTULN
11.2%
0.1%

CCG participants not 100% certain

MemphisMEMNorth TexasUNT
95.7%
NavyNAVYNorth TexasUNT
4.3%
0.1%

CCG participants not 100% certain

NavyNAVYNorth TexasUNT
73.6%
North TexasUNTSouth FloridaUSF
26.4%
0.1%

CCG participants not 100% certain

South FloridaUSFTulaneTULN
86.1%
NavyNAVYTulaneTULN
9.8%
North TexasUNTTulaneTULN
4.1%
0.1%

CCG participants not 100% certain

NavyNAVYSouth FloridaUSF
63.6%
NavyNAVYNorth TexasUNT
22.7%
North TexasUNTSouth FloridaUSF
13.6%
0.1%
MemphisMEMNorth TexasUNT
0.1%

CCG participants not 100% certain

North TexasUNTSouth FloridaUSF
73.0%
NavyNAVYSouth FloridaUSF
27.0%
0.1%

CCG participants not 100% certain

MemphisMEMSouth FloridaUSF
71.6%
North TexasUNTSouth FloridaUSF
28.4%
0.1%
NavyNAVYNorth TexasUNT
<0.1%

CCG participants not 100% certain

North TexasUNTTulaneTULN
51.6%
NavyNAVYTulaneTULN
40.9%
East CarolinaECUTulaneTULN
7.5%
<0.1%
MemphisMEMNorth TexasUNT
<0.1%
MemphisMEMTulaneTULN
<0.1%

How American Athletic Conference Tiebreakers Work

Head-to-head → CFP rank / computer rankings → Common conference opponents → Overall winning percentage

Some tiebreaker steps involve factors like point differential that cannot be predicted before games are played, leading to uncertain outcomes.