Mid-American Conference Tiebreaker Scenarios

Scenarios where tiebreakers determine conference championship game participants

50 of 68 scenarios

ScenarioCCG MatchupProbability
OhioOHIOToledoTOL
6.4%
BuffaloBUFOhioOHIO
4.8%

CCG participants not 100% certain

OhioOHIOToledoTOL
94.7%
BuffaloBUFOhioOHIO
5.3%
3.6%

CCG participants not 100% certain

Miami OHM-OHW MichiganWMU
80.1%
Miami OHM-OHOhioOHIO
19.9%
3.0%
Miami OHM-OHOhioOHIO
3.0%
BuffaloBUFMiami OHM-OH
2.3%
Miami OHM-OHOhioOHIO
2.3%

CCG participants not 100% certain

Miami OHM-OHToledoTOL
58.9%
Miami OHM-OHW MichiganWMU
41.1%
2.2%
Miami OHM-OHOhioOHIO
2.2%

CCG participants not 100% certain

BuffaloBUFOhioOHIO
67.7%
Miami OHM-OHOhioOHIO
20.1%
BuffaloBUFMiami OHM-OH
12.2%
2.1%

CCG participants not 100% certain

Miami OHM-OHW MichiganWMU
56.2%
Miami OHM-OHOhioOHIO
40.1%
BuffaloBUFMiami OHM-OH
3.7%
2.1%
BuffaloBUFOhioOHIO
1.8%

CCG participants not 100% certain

OhioOHIOToledoTOL
99.5%
1.7%
OhioOHIOToledoTOL
1.6%

CCG participants not 100% certain

Miami OHM-OHToledoTOL
63.5%
Miami OHM-OHOhioOHIO
33.2%
BuffaloBUFMiami OHM-OH
3.3%
1.6%

CCG participants not 100% certain

BuffaloBUFOhioOHIO
96.5%
OhioOHIOToledoTOL
3.5%
1.5%
BuffaloBUFOhioOHIO
1.4%

CCG participants not 100% certain

Miami OHM-OHW MichiganWMU
87.2%
Miami OHM-OHOhioOHIO
7.5%
OhioOHIOW MichiganWMU
5.3%
1.4%

CCG participants not 100% certain

BuffaloBUFOhioOHIO
92.1%
OhioOHIOToledoTOL
7.9%
1.3%
OhioOHIOW MichiganWMU
1.2%
ToledoTOLW MichiganWMU
1.2%
Miami OHM-OHOhioOHIO
1.1%
Miami OHM-OHOhioOHIO
1.1%
BuffaloBUFOhioOHIO
0.9%
OhioOHIOW MichiganWMU
0.9%

CCG participants not 100% certain

Miami OHM-OHW MichiganWMU
57.7%
Miami OHM-OHToledoTOL
42.3%
0.8%
OhioOHIOW MichiganWMU
0.8%

CCG participants not 100% certain

ToledoTOLW MichiganWMU
95.2%
OhioOHIOToledoTOL
4.8%
0.8%
BuffaloBUFOhioOHIO
0.8%
BuffaloBUFToledoTOL
0.7%
OhioOHIOW MichiganWMU
0.6%

CCG participants not 100% certain

Miami OHM-OHW MichiganWMU
57.8%
BuffaloBUFMiami OHM-OH
42.2%
0.6%
BuffaloBUFMiami OHM-OH
0.6%

CCG participants not 100% certain

OhioOHIOW MichiganWMU
50.6%
Miami OHM-OHOhioOHIO
49.4%
0.5%
BuffaloBUFOhioOHIO
0.5%

CCG participants not 100% certain

BuffaloBUFW MichiganWMU
39.0%
BuffaloBUFMiami OHM-OH
36.4%
Miami OHM-OHW MichiganWMU
24.6%
0.4%

CCG participants not 100% certain

Miami OHM-OHToledoTOL
71.0%
Miami OHM-OHW MichiganWMU
29.0%
0.4%
ToledoTOLW MichiganWMU
0.4%

CCG participants not 100% certain

Miami OHM-OHW MichiganWMU
74.1%
Miami OHM-OHOhioOHIO
23.9%
C MichiganCMUMiami OHM-OH
2.0%
0.4%

CCG participants not 100% certain

Miami OHM-OHOhioOHIO
77.9%
C MichiganCMUMiami OHM-OH
22.1%
0.4%
BuffaloBUFW MichiganWMU
0.4%

CCG participants not 100% certain

Miami OHM-OHOhioOHIO
82.0%
C MichiganCMUMiami OHM-OH
18.0%
0.3%
BuffaloBUFOhioOHIO
0.3%

CCG participants not 100% certain

BuffaloBUFW MichiganWMU
63.8%
Miami OHM-OHW MichiganWMU
36.2%
0.3%
OhioOHIOW MichiganWMU
0.3%
ToledoTOLW MichiganWMU
0.3%
Miami OHM-OHW MichiganWMU
0.3%
OhioOHIOW MichiganWMU
0.3%

CCG participants not 100% certain

Miami OHM-OHToledoTOL
77.0%
Miami OHM-OHW MichiganWMU
23.0%
0.3%

CCG participants not 100% certain

BuffaloBUFToledoTOL
51.0%
ToledoTOLW MichiganWMU
49.0%
0.3%

How Mid-American Conference Tiebreakers Work

Head-to-head → Common conference opponents → Next-highest opponent → Strength of schedule → Team Rating Score

Some tiebreaker steps involve factors like point differential that cannot be predicted before games are played, leading to uncertain outcomes.