Atlantic Coast Conference Tiebreaker Scenarios

Scenarios where tiebreakers determine conference championship game participants

50 of 277 scenarios

ScenarioCCG MatchupProbability
Georgia TechGTVirginiaUVA
1.1%
SMUSMUVirginiaUVA
1.0%

CCG participants not 100% certain

LouisvilleLOUVirginiaUVA
96.8%
Miami FLMIAVirginiaUVA
3.2%
0.9%
DukeDUKEVirginiaUVA
0.9%
LouisvilleLOUVirginiaUVA
0.8%
SMUSMUVirginiaUVA
0.8%

CCG participants not 100% certain

DukeDUKELouisvilleLOU
87.4%
DukeDUKEMiami FLMIA
12.6%
0.8%
Georgia TechGTVirginiaUVA
0.7%

CCG participants not 100% certain

Georgia TechGTLouisvilleLOU
68.0%
DukeDUKEGeorgia TechGT
18.8%
Georgia TechGTMiami FLMIA
13.2%
0.6%

CCG participants not 100% certain

LouisvilleLOUSMUSMU
72.8%
Miami FLMIASMUSMU
27.2%
0.6%
LouisvilleLOUVirginiaUVA
0.5%
PittsburghPITTVirginiaUVA
0.5%

CCG participants not 100% certain

Miami FLMIASMUSMU
75.5%
DukeDUKESMUSMU
24.5%
0.5%

CCG participants not 100% certain

LouisvilleLOUMiami FLMIA
79.5%
DukeDUKELouisvilleLOU
19.2%
Miami FLMIAPittsburghPITT
1.0%
0.5%

CCG participants not 100% certain

LouisvilleLOUMiami FLMIA
98.0%
DukeDUKELouisvilleLOU
2.0%
0.4%
Georgia TechGTVirginiaUVA
0.4%

CCG participants not 100% certain

Georgia TechGTLouisvilleLOU
72.5%
DukeDUKEGeorgia TechGT
23.5%
Georgia TechGTPittsburghPITT
4.0%
0.4%

CCG participants not 100% certain

LouisvilleLOUVirginiaUVA
99.5%
0.4%
SMUSMUVirginiaUVA
0.4%
Georgia TechGTVirginiaUVA
0.4%
DukeDUKEVirginiaUVA
0.4%

CCG participants not 100% certain

DukeDUKEVirginiaUVA
73.5%
Miami FLMIAVirginiaUVA
26.2%
0.3%
SMUSMUVirginiaUVA
0.3%
DukeDUKEVirginiaUVA
0.3%

CCG participants not 100% certain

LouisvilleLOUVirginiaUVA
95.3%
DukeDUKEVirginiaUVA
4.7%
0.3%

CCG participants not 100% certain

Georgia TechGTPittsburghPITT
53.7%
LouisvilleLOUPittsburghPITT
45.6%
0.3%

CCG participants not 100% certain

LouisvilleLOUVirginiaUVA
98.3%
Miami FLMIAVirginiaUVA
1.7%
0.3%
Georgia TechGTVirginiaUVA
0.3%
LouisvilleLOUVirginiaUVA
0.3%
SMUSMUVirginiaUVA
0.3%
SMUSMUVirginiaUVA
0.3%

CCG participants not 100% certain

DukeDUKELouisvilleLOU
98.1%
DukeDUKEPittsburghPITT
1.1%
0.3%

CCG participants not 100% certain

DukeDUKEMiami FLMIA
87.7%
DukeDUKEGeorgia TechGT
12.3%
0.3%
LouisvilleLOUVirginiaUVA
0.3%
LouisvilleLOUVirginiaUVA
0.3%
SMUSMUVirginiaUVA
0.3%

CCG participants not 100% certain

LouisvilleLOUVirginiaUVA
99.2%
0.2%
DukeDUKEVirginiaUVA
0.2%
Georgia TechGTVirginiaUVA
0.2%
Georgia TechGTVirginiaUVA
0.2%
Georgia TechGTVirginiaUVA
0.2%
PittsburghPITTVirginiaUVA
0.2%

CCG participants not 100% certain

LouisvilleLOUVirginiaUVA
99.5%
0.2%
LouisvilleLOUVirginiaUVA
0.2%

CCG participants not 100% certain

DukeDUKELouisvilleLOU
96.5%
DukeDUKEMiami FLMIA
3.5%
0.2%
DukeDUKEVirginiaUVA
0.2%

CCG participants not 100% certain

LouisvilleLOUSMUSMU
97.5%
DukeDUKESMUSMU
1.5%
PittsburghPITTSMUSMU
1.0%
0.2%

CCG participants not 100% certain

DukeDUKEGeorgia TechGT
83.4%
Georgia TechGTMiami FLMIA
16.6%
0.2%

CCG participants not 100% certain

DukeDUKEVirginiaUVA
79.5%
Miami FLMIAVirginiaUVA
20.5%
0.2%
SMUSMUVirginiaUVA
0.2%

How Atlantic Coast Conference Tiebreakers Work

Head-to-head → Common conference opponents → Record against next-best common opponent → Strength of schedule

Some tiebreaker steps involve factors like point differential that cannot be predicted before games are played, leading to uncertain outcomes.