California

CaliforniaGolden Bears

0-0 T1st (0-0) in ACC

Data from 2026-08-26

Probability to Make the Conference Championship Game

1.8%

Based on 100,000 simulations

What is California's probability of making the Atlantic Coast Conference Championship Game?

California has a 1.8% chance to reach the Atlantic Coast Conference Championship Game, as of week 1 of the 2026 season, based on a 100,000-season Monte Carlo simulation. California's Atlantic Coast Conference Championship Game race is still mathematically wide open.

CaliforniaSchedule & Results

WkDateOpponentResult
9/05
Win prob:57%
9/12
Win prob:48%
9/19
Win prob:90%
9/25
Win prob:28%
10/03
Win prob:42%
10/10
Win prob:41%
10/17
Win prob:50%
10/24
Win prob:23%
10/31
Win prob:38%
11/14
Win prob:29%
11/21
Win prob:65%
11/28
Win prob:42%

Data from 2026-08-26 • SportsSimulate.com

CaliforniaRecord Probabilities

Conf RecordProbabilityCCG if this record
9-0
0.0%
100.0%
8-1
0.3%
95.8%
7-2
1.9%
60.1%
6-3
7.5%
5.1%
5-4
17.3%
0%
4-5
26.3%
0%
3-6
25.4%
0%
2-7
15.4%
0%
1-8
5.2%
0%
0-9
0.8%
0%

Conf Record: Probability of finishing with each conference record.

CCG if this record: If the team finishes with this conference record, their probability of making the championship game.

Data from 2026-08-26 • SportsSimulate.com

Most Likely California CCG Opponents

if California makes the CCG

67.7%
9.5%

Data from 2026-08-26 • SportsSimulate.com

CaliforniaThis Week's Impact

Game
CaliforniaCCG OddsAway
CaliforniaCCG OddsHome
1.7%
(-0.1%)
1.8%
(+0.0%)
1.6%
(-0.2%)
1.8%
(+0.0%)
1.8%
(-0.0%)
1.8%
(+0.0%)
1.8%
(-0.0%)
1.8%
(+0.0%)

Data from 2026-08-26 • SportsSimulate.com

CaliforniaLoss Combination Scenarios

CCG probability given specific future losses

Future Losses
California CCG Probability
Likelihood
Win out
100.0%
<0.1%
Any 1 loss
94.6%
<0.1%
UNLV
100.0%
<0.1%
Pittsburgh
100.0%
<0.1%
Clemson
100.0%
<0.1%
Syracuse
100.0%
<0.1%
NC State
100.0%
<0.1%
UCLA
100.0%
<0.1%
Stanford
100.0%
<0.1%
Wake Forest
100.0%
<0.1%
Virginia Tech
100.0%
<0.1%
SMU
92.3%
<0.1%
Virginia
75.0%
<0.1%
Any 2 losses
70.0%
0.5%
UCLAUNLV
100.0%
<0.1%
NC StateUNLV
100.0%
<0.1%
ClemsonUNLV
100.0%
<0.1%
ClemsonUCLA
100.0%
<0.1%
SMUUNLV
100.0%
<0.1%
StanfordUCLA
100.0%
<0.1%
UNLVVirginia
100.0%
<0.1%
PittsburghUNLV
100.0%
<0.1%
StanfordWake Forest
100.0%
<0.1%
UCLAVirginia Tech
100.0%
<0.1%
UNLVVirginia Tech
100.0%
<0.1%
NC StateWagner
100.0%
<0.1%
StanfordVirginia Tech
100.0%
<0.1%
PittsburghVirginia Tech
100.0%
<0.1%
SyracuseVirginia Tech
100.0%
<0.1%
UCLAVirginia
100.0%
<0.1%
SyracuseUCLA
100.0%
<0.1%
UNLVWagner
100.0%
<0.1%
UNLVWake Forest
100.0%
<0.1%
ClemsonWagner
100.0%
<0.1%
WagnerWake Forest
100.0%
<0.1%
VirginiaWagner
100.0%
<0.1%
UCLAWake Forest
100.0%
<0.1%
SMUWagner
100.0%
<0.1%
StanfordUNLV
100.0%
<0.1%
PittsburghUCLA
100.0%
<0.1%
SyracuseWagner
100.0%
<0.1%
PittsburghStanford
100.0%
<0.1%
SyracuseUNLV
92.3%
<0.1%
SMUUCLA
90.0%
<0.1%
NC StateUCLA
88.9%
<0.1%
ClemsonNC State
86.7%
<0.1%
SyracuseWake Forest
85.7%
<0.1%
ClemsonPittsburgh
83.3%
<0.1%
SMUSyracuse
80.0%
<0.1%
NC StateWake Forest
75.0%
<0.1%
PittsburghWake Forest
75.0%
<0.1%
SyracuseVirginia
75.0%
<0.1%
PittsburghSyracuse
72.7%
<0.1%
NC StatePittsburgh
70.0%
<0.1%
SMUVirginia
66.7%
<0.1%
Virginia TechWake Forest
66.7%
<0.1%
StanfordSyracuse
66.7%
<0.1%
ClemsonVirginia
64.5%
<0.1%
VirginiaVirginia Tech
64.3%
<0.1%
VirginiaWake Forest
63.6%
<0.1%
NC StateSyracuse
62.5%
<0.1%
ClemsonSyracuse
61.5%
<0.1%
ClemsonWake Forest
55.6%
<0.1%
PittsburghSMU
55.0%
<0.1%
ClemsonVirginia Tech
50.0%
<0.1%
NC StateVirginia
50.0%
<0.1%
NC StateVirginia Tech
50.0%
<0.1%
StanfordVirginia
50.0%
<0.1%
SMUStanford
50.0%
<0.1%
NC StateStanford
50.0%
<0.1%
NC StateSMU
44.4%
<0.1%
ClemsonSMU
44.1%
<0.1%
ClemsonStanford
42.9%
<0.1%
PittsburghVirginia
42.9%
<0.1%
SMUVirginia Tech
42.1%
<0.1%
SMUWake Forest
20.0%
<0.1%
Any 3 losses
32.4%
2.0%
UCLAUNLVVirginia
100.0%
<0.1%
ClemsonUCLAUNLV
100.0%
<0.1%
ClemsonUCLAVirginia
100.0%
<0.1%
StanfordUNLVWagner
100.0%
<0.1%
StanfordUCLAWake Forest
100.0%
<0.1%
ClemsonPittsburghUNLV
100.0%
<0.1%
SyracuseUNLVWagner
100.0%
<0.1%
ClemsonVirginia TechWagner
100.0%
<0.1%
StanfordSyracuseUCLA
100.0%
<0.1%
UNLVVirginia TechWagner
100.0%
<0.1%
SMUUCLAWagner
100.0%
<0.1%
SyracuseUCLAWake Forest
100.0%
<0.1%
NC StateUNLVWagner
100.0%
<0.1%
PittsburghStanfordUCLA
100.0%
<0.1%
ClemsonVirginiaWagner
100.0%
<0.1%
SMUStanfordUNLV
100.0%
<0.1%
PittsburghSyracuseUCLA
100.0%
<0.1%
StanfordUCLAUNLV
100.0%
<0.1%
SyracuseVirginiaWagner
100.0%
<0.1%
SMUUNLVWagner
100.0%
<0.1%
PittsburghUCLAUNLV
100.0%
<0.1%
StanfordUNLVWake Forest
100.0%
<0.1%
ClemsonStanfordUCLA
100.0%
<0.1%
PittsburghSMUWagner
100.0%
<0.1%
StanfordSyracuseUNLV
100.0%
<0.1%
ClemsonStanfordWagner
100.0%
<0.1%
UNLVVirginiaWagner
100.0%
<0.1%
UCLAUNLVWagner
100.0%
<0.1%
VirginiaWagnerWake Forest
100.0%
<0.1%
SyracuseWagnerWake Forest
100.0%
<0.1%
NC StateUCLAUNLV
90.0%
<0.1%
SMUUCLAUNLV
85.7%
<0.1%
UCLAUNLVVirginia Tech
83.3%
<0.1%
NC StateSyracuseUNLV
81.8%
<0.1%
ClemsonNC StateUCLA
81.0%
<0.1%
UNLVVirginiaVirginia Tech
80.8%
<0.1%
UCLAVirginia TechWake Forest
80.0%
<0.1%
StanfordUNLVVirginia
80.0%
<0.1%
SyracuseUCLAVirginia Tech
80.0%
<0.1%
PittsburghStanfordUNLV
80.0%
<0.1%
NC StateStanfordUNLV
80.0%
<0.1%
PittsburghUNLVWake Forest
77.8%
<0.1%
ClemsonPittsburghUCLA
76.9%
<0.1%
UCLAVirginiaVirginia Tech
76.9%
<0.1%
ClemsonUNLVWake Forest
75.0%
<0.1%
SMUVirginiaWagner
75.0%
<0.1%
NC StateSMUWagner
75.0%
<0.1%
SyracuseUNLVWake Forest
75.0%
<0.1%
SMUUCLAWake Forest
75.0%
<0.1%
NC StateUCLAWake Forest
75.0%
<0.1%
NC StateUCLAVirginia
72.7%
<0.1%
StanfordUCLAVirginia Tech
71.4%
<0.1%
SyracuseUCLAVirginia
71.4%
<0.1%
ClemsonUCLAWake Forest
71.4%
<0.1%
VirginiaVirginia TechWagner
66.7%
<0.1%
ClemsonNC StateUNLV
66.7%
<0.1%
NC StateUNLVVirginia
66.7%
<0.1%
ClemsonSMUWagner
66.7%
<0.1%
ClemsonUNLVVirginia
65.6%
<0.1%
SMUUNLVVirginia Tech
65.4%
<0.1%
SMUSyracuseUNLV
65.0%
<0.1%
NC StateSyracuseUCLA
63.6%
<0.1%
StanfordUNLVVirginia Tech
62.5%
<0.1%
NC StatePittsburghUNLV
61.5%
<0.1%
ClemsonUNLVVirginia Tech
60.7%
<0.1%
NC StateUCLAVirginia Tech
60.0%
<0.1%
PittsburghUCLAVirginia
60.0%
<0.1%
StanfordUCLAVirginia
60.0%
<0.1%
NC StateSMUUNLV
57.6%
<0.1%
SMUUCLAVirginia Tech
54.5%
<0.1%
PittsburghUNLVVirginia
54.5%
<0.1%
NC StateSMUUCLA
54.5%
<0.1%
ClemsonSMUUCLA
54.2%
<0.1%
SyracuseUNLVVirginia
53.8%
<0.1%
SMUUCLAVirginia
51.8%
<0.1%
UCLAVirginiaWake Forest
50.0%
<0.1%
NC StateUNLVWake Forest
50.0%
<0.1%
ClemsonSyracuseUCLA
50.0%
<0.1%
UNLVVirginia TechWake Forest
50.0%
<0.1%
ClemsonSyracuseUNLV
50.0%
<0.1%
UNLVVirginiaWake Forest
50.0%
<0.1%
PittsburghUCLAWake Forest
50.0%
<0.1%
PittsburghUNLVVirginia Tech
50.0%
<0.1%
SMUWagnerWake Forest
50.0%
<0.1%
NC StatePittsburghUCLA
50.0%
<0.1%
NC StateUNLVVirginia Tech
50.0%
<0.1%
PittsburghVirginia TechWagner
50.0%
<0.1%
ClemsonSyracuseWagner
50.0%
<0.1%
StanfordSyracuseWake Forest
50.0%
<0.1%
NC StateSyracuseWagner
50.0%
<0.1%
PittsburghSyracuseUNLV
50.0%
<0.1%
NC StateVirginiaWagner
50.0%
<0.1%
ClemsonSMUUNLV
48.9%
<0.1%
SMUUNLVVirginia
48.2%
<0.1%
SMUSyracuseUCLA
46.2%
<0.1%
PittsburghSMUUCLA
45.5%
<0.1%
SyracuseUNLVVirginia Tech
42.9%
<0.1%
ClemsonUCLAVirginia Tech
41.7%
<0.1%
PittsburghSMUUNLV
38.1%
<0.1%
ClemsonStanfordUNLV
33.3%
<0.1%
SMUUNLVWake Forest
33.3%
<0.1%
NC StateStanfordVirginia Tech
33.3%
<0.1%
StanfordSyracuseVirginia Tech
33.3%
<0.1%
Virginia TechWagnerWake Forest
33.3%
<0.1%
SMUStanfordUCLA
25.0%
<0.1%
NC StateStanfordVirginia
25.0%
<0.1%
PittsburghSyracuseWake Forest
25.0%
<0.1%
PittsburghUCLAVirginia Tech
20.0%
<0.1%
VirginiaVirginia TechWake Forest
20.0%
<0.1%
ClemsonSMUStanford
15.4%
<0.1%
ClemsonStanfordVirginia Tech
14.3%
<0.1%
ClemsonStanfordSyracuse
14.3%
<0.1%
NC StateSyracuseWake Forest
14.3%
<0.1%
NC StateVirginia TechWake Forest
12.5%
<0.1%
NC StatePittsburghWake Forest
12.5%
<0.1%
StanfordVirginiaVirginia Tech
12.5%
<0.1%
ClemsonSyracuseVirginia Tech
12.5%
<0.1%
SMUVirginiaVirginia Tech
10.7%
<0.1%
ClemsonNC StateSMU
10.1%
<0.1%
SMUSyracuseVirginia
9.7%
<0.1%
NC StateSyracuseVirginia
9.5%
<0.1%
PittsburghSMUSyracuse
9.5%
<0.1%
PittsburghSyracuseVirginia
9.1%
<0.1%
SMUSyracuseVirginia Tech
8.3%
<0.1%
ClemsonPittsburghVirginia
8.3%
<0.1%
PittsburghVirginiaWake Forest
8.3%
<0.1%
PittsburghStanfordVirginia
7.7%
<0.1%
NC StateVirginiaVirginia Tech
7.1%
<0.1%
ClemsonVirginia TechWake Forest
6.7%
<0.1%
ClemsonNC StateWake Forest
6.3%
<0.1%
NC StatePittsburghVirginia Tech
6.3%
<0.1%
NC StateSMUVirginia Tech
6.3%
<0.1%
ClemsonSyracuseVirginia
5.3%
<0.1%
PittsburghSMUWake Forest
5.3%
<0.1%
NC StateSMUWake Forest
5.0%
<0.1%
ClemsonNC StateVirginia Tech
4.8%
<0.1%
ClemsonVirginiaVirginia Tech
4.8%
<0.1%
ClemsonVirginiaWake Forest
4.5%
<0.1%
ClemsonSMUVirginia Tech
4.3%
<0.1%
NC StatePittsburghVirginia
4.3%
<0.1%
ClemsonNC StatePittsburgh
4.0%
<0.1%
SMUStanfordVirginia
3.9%
<0.1%
ClemsonSMUWake Forest
3.6%
<0.1%
PittsburghSMUVirginia Tech
3.5%
<0.1%
NC StatePittsburghSMU
2.9%
<0.1%
ClemsonNC StateVirginia
2.6%
<0.1%
ClemsonSMUSyracuse
2.4%
<0.1%
ClemsonPittsburghSMU
2.0%
<0.1%
ClemsonSMUVirginia
1.4%
<0.1%
Any 4 losses
14.7%
3.2%
StanfordUCLAWagnerWake Forest
100.0%
<0.1%
ClemsonUCLAVirginia TechWagner
100.0%
<0.1%
NC StateSMUUCLAWagner
100.0%
<0.1%
PittsburghUNLVWagnerWake Forest
100.0%
<0.1%
PittsburghSyracuseUCLAVirginia Tech
100.0%
<0.1%
UCLAUNLVVirginiaWagner
100.0%
<0.1%
UCLAUNLVVirginia TechWagner
100.0%
<0.1%
PittsburghUCLAVirginiaWagner
100.0%
<0.1%
StanfordUCLAUNLVWagner
100.0%
<0.1%
NC StateUCLAVirginia TechWagner
100.0%
<0.1%
StanfordUCLAUNLVVirginia Tech
100.0%
<0.1%
ClemsonStanfordUNLVWagner
100.0%
<0.1%
ClemsonNC StateVirginia TechWagner
100.0%
<0.1%
SMUUCLAUNLVWagner
100.0%
<0.1%
ClemsonUCLAUNLVWagner
100.0%
<0.1%
PittsburghStanfordUNLVWagner
100.0%
<0.1%
ClemsonUNLVVirginiaWagner
100.0%
<0.1%
NC StateStanfordUNLVWagner
100.0%
<0.1%
UNLVVirginiaWagnerWake Forest
100.0%
<0.1%
ClemsonSyracuseVirginia TechWagner
100.0%
<0.1%
ClemsonStanfordUCLAUNLV
88.9%
<0.1%
NC StateUCLAUNLVVirginia Tech
87.5%
<0.1%
ClemsonSyracuseUCLAUNLV
85.7%
<0.1%
NC StatePittsburghUCLAUNLV
83.3%
<0.1%
NC StateSyracuseUCLAUNLV
80.0%
<0.1%
SMUStanfordUCLAUNLV
80.0%
<0.1%
PittsburghUCLAUNLVVirginia Tech
77.8%
<0.1%
NC StateUCLAUNLVWake Forest
76.9%
<0.1%
ClemsonNC StateUCLAUNLV
72.2%
<0.1%
StanfordUCLAUNLVVirginia
71.4%
<0.1%
PittsburghUCLAUNLVVirginia
70.6%
<0.1%
UCLAUNLVVirginiaVirginia Tech
68.8%
<0.1%
PittsburghSMUUCLAUNLV
66.7%
<0.1%
PittsburghSyracuseUCLAWagner
66.7%
<0.1%
NC StateSMUUNLVWagner
66.7%
<0.1%
SMUUNLVVirginiaWagner
66.7%
<0.1%
NC StateStanfordUCLAUNLV
66.7%
<0.1%
SyracuseUNLVVirginia TechWagner
66.7%
<0.1%
ClemsonUCLAVirginiaWagner
66.7%
<0.1%
PittsburghStanfordUCLAUNLV
66.7%
<0.1%
SMUUCLAUNLVVirginia Tech
65.2%
<0.1%
ClemsonUCLAUNLVVirginia
63.0%
<0.1%
SMUUCLAUNLVWake Forest
62.5%
<0.1%
PittsburghUCLAUNLVWake Forest
62.5%
<0.1%
NC StateUCLAUNLVVirginia
61.9%
<0.1%
NC StateSMUUCLAUNLV
60.0%
<0.1%
ClemsonPittsburghUNLVWagner
60.0%
<0.1%
ClemsonUCLAUNLVVirginia Tech
57.1%
<0.1%
UCLAUNLVVirginia TechWake Forest
55.6%
<0.1%
UCLAUNLVVirginiaWake Forest
50.0%
<0.1%
ClemsonPittsburghUCLAUNLV
50.0%
<0.1%
PittsburghSMUUNLVWagner
50.0%
<0.1%
SMUUCLAWagnerWake Forest
50.0%
<0.1%
ClemsonSMUUCLAWagner
50.0%
<0.1%
SMUUNLVWagnerWake Forest
50.0%
<0.1%
SMUUCLAVirginiaWagner
50.0%
<0.1%
SMUUNLVVirginia TechWagner
50.0%
<0.1%
PittsburghUNLVVirginia TechWagner
50.0%
<0.1%
ClemsonPittsburghUCLAWagner
50.0%
<0.1%
StanfordSyracuseUCLAVirginia Tech
50.0%
<0.1%
PittsburghSMUUCLAWagner
50.0%
<0.1%
SMUUCLAVirginia TechWagner
50.0%
<0.1%
ClemsonSyracuseUNLVWagner
50.0%
<0.1%
ClemsonSyracuseUCLAWagner
50.0%
<0.1%
SMUUCLAUNLVVirginia
47.4%
<0.1%
SyracuseUCLAUNLVVirginia
44.4%
<0.1%
ClemsonUCLAUNLVWake Forest
44.4%
<0.1%
ClemsonSMUUCLAUNLV
44.1%
<0.1%
SMUSyracuseUCLAUNLV
41.7%
<0.1%
SyracuseUCLAUNLVVirginia Tech
33.3%
<0.1%
ClemsonNC StateUNLVWagner
33.3%
<0.1%
PittsburghVirginiaVirginia TechWagner
33.3%
<0.1%
NC StateUNLVVirginiaWagner
33.3%
<0.1%
ClemsonSMUUNLVWagner
28.6%
<0.1%
PittsburghSyracuseUCLAUNLV
28.6%
<0.1%
NC StateSyracuseUCLAVirginia Tech
28.6%
<0.1%
NC StatePittsburghSyracuseUCLA
25.0%
<0.1%
StanfordSyracuseUCLAWake Forest
25.0%
<0.1%
NC StateSMUSyracuseUCLA
22.2%
<0.1%
NC StateSMUStanfordUNLV
21.4%
<0.1%
PittsburghStanfordUNLVVirginia Tech
20.0%
<0.1%
PittsburghSyracuseUCLAVirginia
20.0%
<0.1%
ClemsonSMUSyracuseWagner
20.0%
<0.1%
StanfordSyracuseUNLVVirginia
20.0%
<0.1%
NC StatePittsburghSyracuseUNLV
20.0%
<0.1%
StanfordSyracuseUCLAVirginia
20.0%
<0.1%
NC StateSyracuseUNLVWake Forest
20.0%
<0.1%
ClemsonNC StateVirginiaWagner
20.0%
<0.1%
ClemsonUCLAVirginia TechWake Forest
18.2%
<0.1%
ClemsonNC StateUCLAVirginia Tech
17.6%
<0.1%
StanfordUNLVVirginia TechWake Forest
16.7%
<0.1%
SMUVirginiaVirginia TechWagner
16.7%
<0.1%
ClemsonNC StateSyracuseUNLV
16.7%
<0.1%
NC StateSyracuseUNLVVirginia Tech
15.4%
<0.1%
PittsburghSMUUNLVVirginia
15.2%
<0.1%
NC StatePittsburghUNLVVirginia Tech
15.0%
<0.1%
StanfordSyracuseUNLVVirginia Tech
14.3%
<0.1%
NC StatePittsburghUCLAWake Forest
14.3%
<0.1%
SMUStanfordUCLAVirginia Tech
14.3%
<0.1%
ClemsonSyracuseUCLAVirginia
12.5%
<0.1%
ClemsonUCLAVirginiaWake Forest
12.5%
<0.1%
ClemsonNC StateSMUUNLV
12.0%
<0.1%
ClemsonSyracuseUNLVVirginia Tech
11.5%
<0.1%
SMUUCLAVirginia TechWake Forest
11.1%
<0.1%
ClemsonStanfordSyracuseUNLV
11.1%
<0.1%
ClemsonNC StateSMUWagner
10.0%
<0.1%
ClemsonNC StateUCLAVirginia
9.5%
<0.1%
SMUStanfordSyracuseUNLV
9.1%
<0.1%
NC StateStanfordUNLVVirginia Tech
9.1%
<0.1%
NC StatePittsburghStanfordUNLV
9.1%
<0.1%
PittsburghSMUUCLAWake Forest
8.3%
<0.1%
ClemsonPittsburghUCLAVirginia
8.3%
<0.1%
ClemsonStanfordUNLVVirginia Tech
8.3%
<0.1%
StanfordUNLVVirginiaVirginia Tech
8.3%
<0.1%
SMUStanfordUNLVWake Forest
8.3%
<0.1%
UCLAVirginiaVirginia TechWake Forest
8.3%
<0.1%
ClemsonPittsburghUNLVVirginia Tech
8.1%
<0.1%
ClemsonPittsburghStanfordUNLV
7.7%
<0.1%
ClemsonStanfordUCLAVirginia
7.7%
<0.1%
NC StatePittsburghUNLVVirginia
7.7%
<0.1%
ClemsonSyracuseUNLVWake Forest
7.7%
<0.1%
PittsburghSMUStanfordUNLV
7.7%
<0.1%
PittsburghStanfordUNLVVirginia
7.7%
<0.1%
SyracuseUNLVVirginiaWake Forest
7.7%
<0.1%
NC StatePittsburghUCLAVirginia Tech
7.1%
<0.1%
NC StatePittsburghUCLAVirginia
7.1%
<0.1%
PittsburghUNLVVirginiaWake Forest
7.1%
<0.1%
ClemsonUNLVVirginiaVirginia Tech
7.0%
<0.1%
NC StateSyracuseUNLVVirginia
6.9%
<0.1%
ClemsonNC StateUNLVVirginia
6.8%
<0.1%
ClemsonSMUUCLAVirginia
6.7%
<0.1%
NC StateSyracuseUCLAVirginia
6.7%
<0.1%
NC StatePittsburghUNLVWake Forest
6.7%
<0.1%
SMUStanfordUCLAVirginia
6.7%
<0.1%
ClemsonPittsburghSMUUNLV
6.5%
<0.1%
ClemsonUCLAVirginiaVirginia Tech
6.5%
<0.1%
PittsburghSMUUNLVWake Forest
6.3%
<0.1%
SMUSyracuseUNLVVirginia Tech
6.3%
<0.1%
ClemsonNC StatePittsburghUCLA
6.3%
<0.1%
SMUSyracuseUNLVWake Forest
5.9%
<0.1%
ClemsonSMUSyracuseUCLA
5.7%
<0.1%
PittsburghSMUUNLVVirginia Tech
5.6%
<0.1%
ClemsonStanfordUNLVVirginia
5.6%
<0.1%
NC StateUNLVVirginiaVirginia Tech
5.6%
<0.1%
NC StatePittsburghSMUUNLV
5.4%
<0.1%
ClemsonUNLVVirginiaWake Forest
5.1%
<0.1%
SMUUCLAVirginiaVirginia Tech
5.0%
<0.1%
NC StateSMUUCLAVirginia
5.0%
<0.1%
ClemsonPittsburghUCLAVirginia Tech
5.0%
<0.1%
SMUStanfordUNLVVirginia Tech
5.0%
<0.1%
PittsburghSyracuseUNLVVirginia
5.0%
<0.1%
NC StatePittsburghSMUUCLA
4.8%
<0.1%
ClemsonSMUStanfordUNLV
4.8%
<0.1%
SyracuseUNLVVirginiaVirginia Tech
4.5%
<0.1%
ClemsonSMUUNLVVirginia Tech
4.5%
<0.1%
NC StateSMUUNLVVirginia
4.3%
<0.1%
ClemsonPittsburghUNLVWake Forest
4.2%
<0.1%
PittsburghUNLVVirginiaVirginia Tech
4.2%
<0.1%
ClemsonPittsburghSyracuseUNLV
4.0%
<0.1%
SMUSyracuseUCLAVirginia
3.9%
<0.1%
ClemsonSMUSyracuseUNLV
3.9%
<0.1%
NC StateSMUUCLAVirginia Tech
3.6%
<0.1%
ClemsonSMUUNLVWake Forest
3.5%
<0.1%
SMUUNLVVirginia TechWake Forest
3.3%
<0.1%
ClemsonSMUUCLAWake Forest
3.2%
<0.1%
NC StateSMUUNLVWake Forest
3.1%
<0.1%
ClemsonSyracuseUNLVVirginia
3.1%
<0.1%
ClemsonNC StatePittsburghUNLV
3.0%
<0.1%
SMUUNLVVirginiaVirginia Tech
2.6%
<0.1%
ClemsonPittsburghSMUUCLA
2.6%
<0.1%
ClemsonNC StateSMUUCLA
2.6%
<0.1%
ClemsonSMUUCLAVirginia Tech
2.4%
<0.1%
NC StateSMUUNLVVirginia Tech
2.3%
<0.1%
SMUUNLVVirginiaWake Forest
2.2%
<0.1%
NC StateSMUSyracuseUNLV
2.2%
<0.1%
SMUSyracuseUNLVVirginia
2.1%
<0.1%
ClemsonSMUUNLVVirginia
1.5%
0.1%

Data from 2026-08-26 • SportsSimulate.com